Look Before You Leap! Suing the United States: A Lawyer’s Guide to Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
Suing the United States: A Lawyer’s Guide to Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
By Jerry Madden
The wisdom of the administrative state, which has its roots in the Progressive and New Deal Eras, is much debated today in all three branches of the federal government. Given the stakeholders who benefit from regulation and those who seek to dismantle the regulatory-agency model, there is every reason to think that suits challenging decisions of the United States, including the president and federal agencies, will increase in the coming years for two reasons. Those who benefit from regulation will resist deregulation, in part, by challenging in court an agency’s justification for repeal of regulations where repeal is inconsistent with the agency’s congressional mandate. Those favoring deregulation will challenge final agency decisions not only to slow or reverse the impact of regulation generally but also to advocate for overturning case law that requires the courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of statutes it implements and its accompanying regulations.
The Administrative State Is Under Siege by All Three Branches The framers could hardly have envisioned today’s vast and varied federal bureaucracy and the authority administrative agencies now hold over our economic, social, and political activities.
—Chief Justice John Roberts
A practitioner involved in suits seeking to restrain or affect the actions of the federal government must appreciate the fact that suing the United States is not like suing a private party. A private defendant is not protected by sovereign immunity and typically is not the beneficiary of constitutional limitations or the limited jurisdiction of the federal courts. This article provides an overview of the many thorny issues that can arise in suits seeking to enjoin the actions or conduct of the sovereign and addresses not only the scope of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) but also the implicit causes of action the Supreme Court has recognized when the government, including the Executive Office of the President of the United States, acts unconstitutionally or in excess of statutory authority. Both government and private attorneys will need to be well versed in the law governing equitable actions against the United States or federal agencies.... [Read more...]
In ancient Greece, speech was thought to be superior to writing. Socrates said that true knowledge and understanding is not served by writing because it leads to misunderstanding and cannot be questioned.... [Read more...]
Fallout from the Great Recessions continues to work its way through the courts. The latest is Perry Capital LLC v. Mnuchin, No. 14-5243 (D.C. Cir.), a high-profile case in which shareholders... [Read more...]
On February 16, 2017, the D.C. Circuit vacated its decision in PHH Corp. v. CFPB, No. 15-1177, and ordered that the case be reheard en banc (meaning reheard by all 11 judges on the court)... [Read more...]
President Trump set forth the Administration’s Core Principals for Regulating the U.S. Financial System in an Executive Order, dated February 3, 2017. There is a lot to like in these... [Read more...]
Gary Cohn, the new National Economic Council Director, said yesterday the Administration will soon propose legislation to undo the Dodd Frank Act, according to the headline article in... [Read more...]
Sixteen state attorneys general have filed briefs in PHH Corporation, et al. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on petitions for... [Read more...]
Combining “Big Law” relationships and a long history of success with small firm attention and cost-effective representation, Jerry Madden is pleased to announce the opening of Madden Law... [Read more...]